Please help me reformulate it to make it more accessible.
What I means was this: people are more open to improve the tech if the maturity model is not targeting them as individual (e.g. your team sucks) and instead talks about the tech (e.g. this service sucks).
People evolve, but systems don't. At least until AGI takes over, people evolve systems. So instead of attacking people's identity and calling them immature, we should shift the conversation to the tech while maintaining a respect to people who build the tech.
There's an image at the end that tries to elaborate the point (maybe you need to refresh the browser because the image is added an hour ago).
Love this article.
But this part i dont get it
“People lift the tech only when technical maturity is detached from their own identity.”
Please help me reformulate it to make it more accessible.
What I means was this: people are more open to improve the tech if the maturity model is not targeting them as individual (e.g. your team sucks) and instead talks about the tech (e.g. this service sucks).
People evolve, but systems don't. At least until AGI takes over, people evolve systems. So instead of attacking people's identity and calling them immature, we should shift the conversation to the tech while maintaining a respect to people who build the tech.
There's an image at the end that tries to elaborate the point (maybe you need to refresh the browser because the image is added an hour ago).
Let me know how I can improve this statement.